USPTO serial 86230174
SMEDIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMEDIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Austin Padgett, Esq.
AUSTIN PADGETT, ESQ. TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP600 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 5200ATLANTA, GA 30308-2216UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | French fries; french fried potatoes for consumption on or off the premises; Prepared meals for human consumption consisting primarily of chicken; Combination meal, consisting primarily of a chicken and french fries for consumption on or off the premises; Combination meal consisting primarily of a meat or vegetable-based entree and a soup or salad for consumption on or off the premises; Combination meal consisting primarily of a meat or vegetable-based entree and french fries for consumption on or off the premises; Food for consumption off the premises, namely, meals consisting primarily of a meat or vegetable-based entrée one choice of side items, namely, bread, garden salad, kernel corn, green beans, potato cakes, cole slaw, macaroni salad, rice, potato salad, pasta salad, french fries, baked potatoes, sweet potatoes, macaroni and cheese, and mashed potatoes with gravy, sold as a unit for consumption on or off the premises; Milk-based beverages containing coffee; processed fruit; onion rings; Cooked and prepared chicken for consumption on or off the premises; Prepared meal consisting of cooked chicken, rice and vegetables all served in a bowl; potato-based snack foods; Meals consisting primarily of chicken | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Prepared meals for human consumption consisting primarily of hamburger sandwiches; Sandwiches for consumption on or off the premises; Combination meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice-based entrees and soup or salad for consumption on or off the premises; sandwiches; combination meal, consisting primarily of a sandwich and french fries for consumption on or off the premises; combination meal, consisting primarily of a hamburger and french fries for consumption on or off the premises; cookies; biscuits; bread; cakes; tea; pastries; sauces; seasonings, sugar; ground and whole bean coffee; Pizza pies and prepared pasta; hot dog sandwiches; Frozen dairy confections made from candied ice milk for consumption on or off the premises; burritos for consumption on or off the premises; ice cream desserts; ice cream drinks; ice cream floats; ice cream; bakery goods and dessert items, namely, cakes, cookies, pastries, candies, and frozen confections for consumption on or off the premises | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Soft drinks for consumption on or off the premises; soft drinks; Fruit drinks and fruit juices; non-alcoholic fruit-flavored slush-type drinks; smoothies; coffee-flavored soft drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by W. Matthew Busbice
- Other trademarks owned by W. Matthew Busbice
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named SMEDIUM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 26, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 26, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 24, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 29, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 9, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |