Drawing for TOTAL LUBRICATION MANAGMENT

USPTO serial 86231098

TOTAL LUBRICATION MANAGMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOTAL LUBRICATION MANAGMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elise Tenen-Aoki

ELISE TENEN-AOKI Kacvinsky Daisak Bluni PLLC3120 Princeton Pike, Suite 303Lawrenceville, NJ 08648UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing business management and consultation, business advice and information for industrial processing facilities having equipment requiring lubrication systems; providing independent ratings and reviews of other businesses for commercial purposes; conducting business audits in the field of industrial processing facilities; auditing, namely, account auditing and business auditing for industrial processing facilities having equipment requiring lubrication systemsACTIVE—
036Providing financial analysis, financial advice, financial consultation and financial information for industrial processing facilities having equipment requiring lubrication systemsACTIVE—
037Installation and maintenance of lubrication systems for industrial processing facilitiesACTIVE—
042Design and development of lubrication systems for industrial processing facilitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2015UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jul 20, 2015MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 20, 2015ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 17, 2015EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 16, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 16, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 16, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 23, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance