Drawing for POWER TO THE PURCHASE

USPTO serial 86231444

POWER TO THE PURCHASE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWER TO THE PURCHASE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nadine N. Mustafa

NADINE N. MUSTAFA YOUNG BASILE HANLON & MACFARLANE P.C.3001 W BIG BEAVER RD STE 624TROY, MI 48084-3107UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035operating on-line marketplaces for sellers of goods and/or services; providing a website that allows retailers to provide consumer-preference driven retail coupons, rebates, group offers, and custom goods and services packages; providing a website for use by businesses for listing, searching, managing, and storing consumer product and services information in a databaseACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 10, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 18, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 2, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 13, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 9, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 8, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance