USPTO serial 86231520
G WATCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRINGER, DANIEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with G WATCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Seoul 150-721, KR
Seoul 150-721, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Kenney
ROBERT J KENNEY BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCH LLPPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Watches | ABANDONED | Jul 7, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 25, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 25, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 2016 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 2, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |