USPTO serial 86231963
ROOMGOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4729373Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 28, 2015
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROOMGOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Encinitas, CA
Encinitas, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pollie Gautsch
POLLIE A GAUTSCH THE UPPER DECK COMPANY LLC665 San Rodolfo Dr. #124-209Solana Beach, CA 92075Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | pillow cases, duvets, coverlets, bed blankets, throws, comforters; bed sheets, coverlets, bed blankets; bed linens; towels; bath linens | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Dec 10, 2014 |
| 035 | Retail and online store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Dec 10, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 2016 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 26, 2015 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 23, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2015 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2014 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2014 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |