Drawing for SMART AIR

USPTO serial 86232338

SMART AIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YARD, JOHN S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART AIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Milena S. Mishev

Milena S. Mishev Kaplan Breyer Schwarz & Ottesen, LLP100 Matawan RoadSuite 120Matawan, NJ 07747

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software design and development; Design, development, installation, maintenance and repair of communication software for remote control of lighting, automatic blinds, shutters, awnings, blinds, home appliances, audio-video devices, sports and leisure devices; Design, development, installation, maintenance and repair of software for remote control of sensors for remote control and operation of lighting, automatic blinds, shutters, awnings, blinds, shutters, household appliances, audio-video devices, sports and recreational equipment and the like; and design, development, installation, maintenance and repair of software for remote control of sensors using wireless devices including mobile devices, namely, smart phones, tablets or laptops; Computer software development in the field of mobile applicationsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 22, 2017MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Feb 22, 2017ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Feb 21, 2017EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 16, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 18, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 16, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 11, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 9, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 16, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 19, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 5, 2015TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
May 5, 2015OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 5, 2015OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Feb 4, 2015OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 4, 2015OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 6, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 17, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 1, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 12, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 12, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 1, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 16, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 16, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 16, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 18, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance