USPTO serial 86232338
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Milena S. Mishev
Milena S. Mishev Kaplan Breyer Schwarz & Ottesen, LLP100 Matawan RoadSuite 120Matawan, NJ 07747| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software design and development; Design, development, installation, maintenance and repair of communication software for remote control of lighting, automatic blinds, shutters, awnings, blinds, home appliances, audio-video devices, sports and leisure devices; Design, development, installation, maintenance and repair of software for remote control of sensors for remote control and operation of lighting, automatic blinds, shutters, awnings, blinds, shutters, household appliances, audio-video devices, sports and recreational equipment and the like; and design, development, installation, maintenance and repair of software for remote control of sensors using wireless devices including mobile devices, namely, smart phones, tablets or laptops; Computer software development in the field of mobile applications | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 18, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 16, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 19, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2015 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 5, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 2015 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 16, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |