USPTO serial 86232867
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Advanced California Innovative Institute, Inc.
Alhambra, CA
Other trademarks owned by Advanced California Innovative Institute, Inc.
Advanced California Innovative Institute, Inc.
Alhambra, CA
Other trademarks owned by Advanced California Innovative Institute, Inc.
Advanced California Innovative Institute, Inc.
Alhambra, CA
Other trademarks owned by Advanced California Innovative Institute, Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Albert J.C. Chang
Albert J.C. Chang Chang & Cote, LLP19138 E. Walnut Dr. N. Ste. 100Rowland Heights, CA 91748UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Education services, namely, one-on-one mentoring in the fields of English and Math concepts; Education services, namely, providing kindergarten through 12th grade (K-12) classroom instruction; Education services, namely, providing mentoring, tutoring, classes, seminars and workshops in the field of attaining higher education; Educational and entertainment services, namely, providing motivational and educational speakers; Educational and entertainment services, namely, providing motivational and educational speakers in the field of self- and personal improvement; Educational services, namely, conducting distance learning instruction at the primary and secondary levels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 1987 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2024 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 20, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 5, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 15, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |