USPTO serial 86233291
DEL CAFÉ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DEL CAFÉ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Phillip Brazlavsky
PHILLIP BRAZLAVSKY DEL MONTE FRESH PRODUCE COMPANY241 SEVILLA AVENUE PENTHOUSECORAL GABLES, FL 33134-6622UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Combination meal consisting primarily of a meat or vegetable-based entree and a soup or salad for consumption on or off the premises; Cut fruits; Dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; Dairy-based snack foods excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; Food package combinations consisting primarily of cheese, meat and/or processed fruit; Frozen fruits; Frozen vegetables; Fruit salads and vegetable salads; Fruit-based snack food; Guacamole; Hummus; Prepared entrees consisting primarily of vegetables, soups, fruit salads and vegetable salads; Preserved, dried and cooked fruit and vegetables; Processed fruits; Processed vegetables; Ready-to-eat meals comprised primarily of meats, cheese and also including fruit and/or vegetables; Refrigerated food package combinations consisting primarily of meat, cheese or processed vegetables for purposes of creating a sandwich; Salads, namely, garden salads, fruit salads, vegetable salads; Shakes; Sliced fruits; Sliced vegetables; Vegetable-based snack foods; Yogurt; salads with meat, fish, seafood, cheese, soy and/or other protein-based foods, namely, antipasto salads; prepared salads, namely, pre-cut vegetable salads, chopped vegetable and garden salads, Caesar salads, cobb salads, chicken salads, tuna salads, legume salads, spinach salads, kale salads, taco salads, potato salads, egg salads, tofu salads and vegan salads made primarily of vegetables; cole slaw; health salad and health slaw made primarily of vegetables; prepared salads consisting primarily of vegetables and meats, namely, Greek salads, Southwestern salads, Santa Fe salads, Asian salads and Thai salads | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | Fruit beverages; Fruit drinks and fruit juices; Fruit juices and fruit drinks; Smoothies; Vegetable drinks; Vegetable juices; Vegetable-fruit juices | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |