USPTO serial 86234094
XTREME CLEAN AUTO WASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 21, 2017
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with XTREME CLEAN AUTO WASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bay Area Touchless Carwash, L.L.C.
Traverse City, MI, US
Other trademarks owned by Bay Area Touchless Carwash, L.L.C.
Bay Area Touchless Carwash, L.L.C.
Traverse City, MI, US
Other trademarks owned by Bay Area Touchless Carwash, L.L.C.
Bay Area Touchless Carwash, L.L.C.
Traverse City, MI, US
Other trademarks owned by Bay Area Touchless Carwash, L.L.C.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer A. Puplava
Jennifer A. Puplava MIKA MEYERS PLC900 MONROE AVE NWGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503-2474UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Automated carwash services | ACTIVE | Mar 30, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bay Area Touchless Carwash, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Bay Area Touchless Carwash, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Bay Area Touchless Carwash, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named XTREME CLEAN AUTO WASH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 19, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 7, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 9, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 14, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 25, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 27, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |