USPTO serial 86234869
INTERFIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5124664Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 17, 2017
- Examiner
- HETZEL, DANNEAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTERFIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Interflow Holdings Pty Limited
Sydney, NSW, AU
Interflow Holdings Pty Limited
Sydney, NSW, AU
Interflow Holdings Pty Limited
Sydney, NSW, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James W. Inskeep, Esq.
JAMES W. INSKEEP, ESQ. INSKEEP INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GROUP, INC.2281 W 190TH ST STE 200TORRANCE, CA 90504-6000UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Application of protective coatings; application of surface coatings; maintenance of water wells, chambers and pipelines; repair of water wells, chambers and pipelines; renovation and preservation of water wells, chambers and pipelines; installation, repair and maintenance of pumps and pipeline systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 31, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Interflow Holdings Pty Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Interflow Holdings Pty Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Interflow Holdings Pty Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named INTERFIT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 17, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 13, 2016 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 10, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 10, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 10, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 9, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |