USPTO serial 86240230
STAY CONTACTABLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STAY CONTACTABLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Contactable (Proprietary) Limited
Sandton, Johannesburg, ZA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William C. Wright
William C. Wright Epstein Drangel LLP60 East 42nd Street, Suite 2520New York, NY 10165UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer application software for mobile phones, smart phones, computer tablets and other electronic devices used to store, maintain, share and manage a user's contact information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |