USPTO serial 86240261
CARTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VENGROFF, MARILYN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Canada, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank J. Bonini, Jr.
FRANK J. BONINI, JR. HARDING, EARLEY, FOLLMER & FRAILEY, P.C.PO BOX 750VALLEY FORGE, PA 19482-0750UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing on-line access to business applications software, namely, inventory software, order management software, supply chain software, customer relationship management software for recording, monitoring, tracking and processing order data, contact management software, electronic mail and messaging software, software for retrieving news, information and updates from suppliers, partners and social media services providers, and software for publishing content on different social media websites; hosting an interactive website for users to participate in discussions, aggregate information and resources, and engage in social and business networking; providing customized web pages featuring user-defined information, contact information, product and services profiles, audio and images | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2016 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 31, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |