Drawing for STRUCSURE SAFE-SCALABLE-RELIABLE

USPTO serial 86241228

STRUCSURE SAFE-SCALABLE-RELIABLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STRUCSURE SAFE-SCALABLE-RELIABLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Hope V. Shovein

HOPE V. SHOVEIN BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.1000 TOWN CTR 22ND FLSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075-1238UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Interior components for vehicles, namely, vehicle seats, seat backs, seat cushions, seat covers, recliners, seat tracks, seat frames, seat assemblies, seat adjusters, seat position adjusting track systems, headrests, bolsters, lumbar supports, shoulder supports, armrests, mechanical, pneumatic and electromechanical devices mounted in vehicle seatsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 11, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 11, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 10, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 6, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 15, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 12, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 12, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 18, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 4, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 17, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 16, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 16, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 10, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 8, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 6, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 6, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 5, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 10, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 18, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 2, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 30, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 14, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2014MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 16, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance