USPTO serial 86241252
ULTRA PREMIUM EFFICIENCY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4896530Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 2, 2016
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ULTRA PREMIUM EFFICIENCY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Signal Hill, CA
Signal Hill, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth L. Green
KENNETH L. GREEN AVERILL & GREEN14831 WHITTIER BOUELVARD STE 206WHITTIER, CA 90605UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Electric Motors, not for land vehicles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 23, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 29, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2015 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 13, 2015 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |