Drawing for RAZOR FIN

USPTO serial 86241315

RAZOR FIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, KAREN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RAZOR FIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark F. Warzecha

RAZOR FIN LLC1990 WEST NEW HAVEN AVESTE 201MELBOURNE, FL 32904

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Decals; StickersABANDONEDJan 1, 2014
025Hats; Headwear; Hooded sweat shirts; Polo shirts; Shirts; Short-sleeved shirts; Sweat shirts; T-shirts; Tank tops; VisorsABANDONEDJan 1, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2016MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 20, 2016ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 20, 2016OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 20, 2016OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jul 16, 2015OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 16, 2015ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 4, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 30, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 21, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 21, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 14, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 14, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 10, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 17, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance