USPTO serial 86241453
EV EDGEVERVE AN INFOSYS COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 18, 2017
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EV EDGEVERVE AN INFOSYS COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Naresh Kilaru
Naresh Kilaru Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP901 New York Avenue, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed matter and printed publications, namely, brochures, white papers, newsletters, reports, books, journals, and magazines relating to computers, computer programs, computer hardware, computer software, data processing, and information technology infrastructure systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2014 |
| 035 | Business consulting services related to information technology, systems management and integration, product development and support, and software engineering; business consultancy services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2014 |
| 036 | Financial advisory and consultancy services; financial analysis and research services; financial research and information services; strategic financial advisory services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2014 |
| 038 | Electronic exchange of data stored in databases accessible via telecommunications networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2014 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software in the field of call center management for operating and managing call centers; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing, routing, and monitoring telephone calls and other inquiries between customers and customer service call centers and agents; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing, tracking and reporting customer calls and inquiries; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for communicating and facilitating the exchange of information between businesses and their customer service agents and call centers in real time; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for remotely monitoring call centers; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for enabling communication between call center managers and agents; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for routing callers across multiple sites and multiple call center technologies; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for facilitating customer self-help through interactive text, multimedia, online forums, and online communities; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing customer loyalty and customer reward programs; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for disseminating customer service messages to customers via SMS, email, telephone, and other electronic means; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for the aggregation, discovery, management, and analysis of data; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for connecting data sources; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for facilitating collaboration and decision making for businesses; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for database management, distributing content via the Internet; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; research and design in the field of computer data and databases; design and development of computer hardware and software; consultation in the fields of computer databases, computer hardware and software, data storage, aggregation, discovery, management, and analysis; technical research namely, scientific, mechanical and product research; computer hardware and software development, design, analysis, and testing services; information technology infrastructure consultation services; computer software programming services; computer software consulting services; computer software design services; computer software installation, upgrade and maintenance services; hosting websites for others for Internet communications; computer services, namely, remote management of the information technology (IT) systems of others; development and creation of computer programs for data processing; computer technical support services, namely, service desk or help desk services for IT infrastructure, operating systems, database systems, and web applications | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EdgeVerve Systems Limited
- Other trademarks owned by EdgeVerve Systems Limited
- Other trademarks owned by EdgeVerve Systems Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EV EDGEVERVE AN INFOSYS COMPANY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2023 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 3, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 11, 2023 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Mar 11, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 29, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 11, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 15, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 27, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 25, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 30, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 10, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 11, 2014 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |