USPTO serial 86242528
ESP TOUCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ESP TOUCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacey R. Halpern
STACEY R. HALPERN KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR2040 MAIN ST FL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-8214UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE; ROUTERS FOR CONVERTING SENSOR AND CONTROL DATA PROTOCOLS FROM FACILITY ENERGY LOADS, SYSTEMS, OR SUBSYSTEMS INTO IP OR OPEN SOURCE PROTOCOLS FOR THE PURPOSE OF ELECTRONICALLY DECIPHERING, TRANSMITTING, STORING, ANALYZING, MANAGING, AND OPTIMIZING ENERGY LOADS, USAGE, AND COSTS WITHIN BUILDINGS OR DATA CENTERS; CODECS FOR ENCODING AND COMPRESSING ENERGY AND RELATED DATA, FOR TRANSMISSION IN REAL TIME FOR SUBSEQUENT DECODING BY ANALYTIC AND CONTROL SYSTEMS; REAL TIME ELECTRIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR ENERGY MANAGEMENT; AUTOMATED MONITORING AND CONTROL SYSTEM FOR ASSEMBLING AND TRANSMITTING REAL TIME INFORMATION AND CONTROL OF ENERGY USAGE, LOADS, TRAFFIC, GENERATION, AND COST; AUTOMATED REAL TIME TRANSMISSION OF ENERGY INFORMATION AND CONTROL DATA TO AND FROM THE CLOUD OR OTHER COMPUTERIZED ANALYTIC SYSTEMS; WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICES FOR USE WITH ENERGY SENSORS, ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, BUILDING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, BUILDING SENSORS, O2 SENSORS, CO2 SENSORS, OCCUPANCY SENSORS, BUILDING SYSTEMS, BUILDING SUBSYSTEMS, AND RELATED SOFTWARE; ELECTRIC MEASUREMENT, MONITORING, OF MONITORING AND CONTROL SIGNALS FOR USE WITH ENERGY SENSORS, ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, BUILDING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, CONTROL RELAYS, SYSTEM CONTROL DATA, AND RELATED SOFTWARE; WIRELESS CONTROLLERS TO REMOTELY MONITOR AND CONTROL THE FUNCTION AND STATUS OF ENERGY AND UTILITY SYSTEMS AND RELATED SOFTWARE; ELECTRONIC DEVICES, NAMELY, RADIO FREQUENCY REPEATERS USED TO EXTEND THE RANGE OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICES FOR TRACKING, MONITORING, ANALYZING, OR CONTROLLING ENERGY USAGE; REAL TIME ENERGY SENSORS; AUTOMATED PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF SENSING CIRCUITS, HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE THAT ARE USED TO MONITOR, TRACK, REPORT, MANAGE AND CONTROL ENERGY GENERATION, USAGE, TRAFFIC, LOADS AND CROWD SOURCE AND CROWD SENSING INFORMATION; ELECTRONIC DEVICES, HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR REAL TIME ENERGY ASSESSMENT AND MATCHING OF ENERGY GENERATION, LOADS, AND USAGE IN A NANOGRID, MICROGRID, OR METROGRID | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | PROVIDING REAL-TIME INFORMATION REGARDING ENERGY GENERATION, LOAD, USAGE, COSTS, AND TRAFFIC OF BUILDINGS, SUBSYSTEMS, ENERGY SENSORS, ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, BUILDING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, BUILDING SENSORS, O2 SENSORS, CO2 SENSORS, OCCUPANCY SENSORS, BUILDING SYSTEMS, BUILDING SUBSYSTEMS, NANOGRIDS, MICROGRIDS, METROGRIDS, CROWD SOURCE AND CROWD SENSING AND RELATED SOFTWARE; REAL TIME ENERGY ASSESSMENT AND MATCHING OF ENERGY GENERATION, LOADS, USAGE, CROWD SOURCE INFORMATION AND CROWD SENSING INFORMATION IN A NANOGRID, MICROGRID, OR METROGRID AND RELATED SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |