USPTO serial 86245985
MASTERCHEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MASTERCHEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D. Wells
NICHOLAS D. WELLS Kirton McConkie60 E. South Temple1800 World Trade CenterSalt Lake City, UT 84111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | edible fats and oils; olive oil; extra virgin olive oil; peanut oil; grapeseed oil; sunflower oil; corn oil; maize oil; cooking oil; seed cooking oils; soybean oil; vegetable oils; preserved olives; olive paste; preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; pickled vegetables in vinegar; bagged, canned or bottled cut vegetables; bagged, canned or bottled cut fruits; pickles; jellies; marmalade; eggs; milk and milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; cheese; processed cheese; yogurt; meat, fish, not live, poultry and game; fish fillets; pickled fish; processed fish; preserved fish; frozen, prepared or packaged meals consisting primarily of fish; canned fish; meat extracts; frozen, prepared or packaged meals consisting primarily of poultry; compotes | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | vinegar, sauces in the nature of (condiments ); condiment sauces, namely, curry sauce, ketchup, mustard, chili sauce; sauces for pasta; meat gravies; prepared meat pies; spices; pasta; stuffed pasta; fish sauce; cheese sauce; flour; flour for food; pizza; prepared pizzas; pizza bases, namely prepared pizza crusts; pizza dough; sauces for pizzas; preparations made from cereals, namely, bread, cereal-based snack foods, cakes, muffins, pastries; pies; cookies; confectionery made of sugar; confectioneries, namely, chocolate snack foods, pastilles, baking chips, frozen confectionery, flavored ices; prepared desserts, namely, bakery desserts and ice cream desserts; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt; coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; ice | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |