Drawing for TEDI

USPTO serial 86248040

TEDI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHANG, KATHERINE S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TEDI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Vande Sande

THOMAS J. VANDE SANDE HALL & VANDE SANDE LLC10220 RIVER RD STE 200POTOMAC, MD 20854-4932UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Fruit beverages and fruit juices; non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beverages; vegetable drinks; vegetable juice beverages; fruit drinks; non-alcoholic cocktails; alcohol-free drinks, namely, soft drinks; fruit-flavored beverages; vegetable juices; carrot juices; multi-fruit juices; non-alcoholic fresh fruit nectars; syrups for making beverages; preparations for making beverages, namely, fruit drinks; syrups for beveragesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 19, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 18, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 16, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 31, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2016TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 31, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 31, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 15, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 2, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 30, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 3, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 6, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 17, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 1, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 12, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 11, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 11, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 11, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 5, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 2, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance