Drawing for SUNTIVITY

USPTO serial 86248114

SUNTIVITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GEARHART, DAVID JAMES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUNTIVITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G MATHEW LOMBARD

G MATHEW LOMBARD LOMBARD & GELIEBTER LLP305 BROADWAY 7 FLNEW YORK, NY 10007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics and skin care preparations, namely, non-medicated creams, moisturizers, cleansers, gels and lotions; non-medicated, non-therapeutic preparations for use in the relief of skin irritation; sunscreens and sunblocksACTIVE—
010Medical devices, namely, phototherapeutic apparatusACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 28, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 24, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 13, 2017TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Sep 13, 2017OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 13, 2017OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Oct 30, 2015OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 30, 2015CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2015APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 22, 2015EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
May 14, 2015ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 5, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 5, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 15, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 30, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 12, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 9, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 9, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 24, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 29, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance