Drawing for DAYLONG

USPTO serial 86248122

DAYLONG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GEARHART, DAVID JAMES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DAYLONG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G MATHEW LOMBARD

G MATHEW LOMBARD LOMBARD & GELIEBTER LLP305 BROADWAYFL 7NEW YORK, NY 10007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical devices, namely, phototherapeutic apparatusACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 20, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 18, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 21, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 1, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 9, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 13, 2016GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jun 13, 2016GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jun 13, 2016CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Dec 12, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 12, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 11, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 19, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 19, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 31, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 24, 2014MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance