USPTO serial 86251550
GENERATIONS SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NOVAKOVIC, MIROSLAV
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GENERATIONS SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grand Haven, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas L. Lockhart
TIMOTHY EDWARD EAGLE VARNUM RIDDERING SCHMIDT & HOWLETT LLPPO BOX 352BRIDGEWATER PLACEGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501-0352Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Leasing of apartments; Management of apartments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2015 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 12, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |