Drawing for TERRACOR

USPTO serial 86251985

TERRACOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TERRACOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kimberley Cunningham

Kimberley Cunningham Bennett Jones LLP3200 TELUS HOUSE, 10020 - 100 StreetEdmonton, AB, T5J0N3CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004resin coated proppant for use in oil well and gas well hydraulic fracturing operations; and ceramic coated proppant for use in oil well and gas well hydraulic fracturing operationsACTIVE—
019frac sandACTIVE—
035distributorship services in the field of oilfield service materials, namely, cement, pipe, guar and frac sand; transload facility management services, namely, supply chain management services, freight logistics management, transportation logistics services in the nature of arranging the transportation of goods for others, and inventory control; consulting services in the field of freight logistics management and inventory management; business consulting services in the field of operating a mining extraction companyACTIVE—
036brokerage of oilfield service materials, namely, frac sand, resin-coated and ceramic proppants; freight transportation brokerageACTIVE—
037mining extraction and quarrying services; operation of transload facilities, namely, freight loading and unloading servicesACTIVE—
039freight transportation by rail, trucks and barges; consulting services in the field of freight transportation by truck, train and barges; transload facility management services, namely, supply chain logistics and reverse logistics in the nature of storage, transportation and delivery of goods for others by rail, ship or truck; freight brokerage services; warehousing services, namely, storage and distribution of oilfield service materials, namely, cement, pipe, guar and frac sand; distribution services, namely, delivery of oilfield service materials, namely, cement, pipe, guar and frac sand; consulting services in the field of mining extraction; freight transportation by rail, trucks and bargesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 3, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 23, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 23, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 23, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2016GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2016GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 27, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 25, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2015GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2015GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 4, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 10, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 2, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2014MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance