USPTO serial 86251985
TERRACOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TERRACOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberley Cunningham
Kimberley Cunningham Bennett Jones LLP3200 TELUS HOUSE, 10020 - 100 StreetEdmonton, AB, T5J0N3CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | resin coated proppant for use in oil well and gas well hydraulic fracturing operations; and ceramic coated proppant for use in oil well and gas well hydraulic fracturing operations | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | frac sand | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | distributorship services in the field of oilfield service materials, namely, cement, pipe, guar and frac sand; transload facility management services, namely, supply chain management services, freight logistics management, transportation logistics services in the nature of arranging the transportation of goods for others, and inventory control; consulting services in the field of freight logistics management and inventory management; business consulting services in the field of operating a mining extraction company | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | brokerage of oilfield service materials, namely, frac sand, resin-coated and ceramic proppants; freight transportation brokerage | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | mining extraction and quarrying services; operation of transload facilities, namely, freight loading and unloading services | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | freight transportation by rail, trucks and barges; consulting services in the field of freight transportation by truck, train and barges; transload facility management services, namely, supply chain logistics and reverse logistics in the nature of storage, transportation and delivery of goods for others by rail, ship or truck; freight brokerage services; warehousing services, namely, storage and distribution of oilfield service materials, namely, cement, pipe, guar and frac sand; distribution services, namely, delivery of oilfield service materials, namely, cement, pipe, guar and frac sand; consulting services in the field of mining extraction; freight transportation by rail, trucks and barges | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Terracor Canada Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named TERRACOR
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |