USPTO serial 86253077
APPTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 9, 2016
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, LAURA DAWN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with APPTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,700
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric Hanscom
Eric Hanscom InterContinental IP7040 Avenida Encinas, Suite 104-358Carlsbad, CA 92011UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Communications software for connecting users of electronic devices; Computer software for administration of computer networks; Computer software for application and database integration; Computer software for communicating with users of hand-held computers; Computer software for wireless content delivery; Computer software for use in database management; Computer software, namely, electronic financial platform that accommodates multiple types of payment and debt transactions in an integrated mobile phone, PDA, and web based environment; Downloadable computer software for use in database management | ACTIVE | May 7, 2013 |
| 036 | Accounts payable debiting services; Bill payment services; Bill payment services provided through a website; Charge card and credit card services; Charge card services; Check processing; Check verification; Credit card and debit card services; Credit card and payment card services; Credit card payment processing services; Electronic cash transactions; Electronic check acceptance services; Electronic credit card transactions; Electronic debit transactions; Electronic funds transfer; Electronic funds transfer by telecommunications; Electronic payment services by which utility customers may apply money from various sources for payment of energy costs; Electronic payment services involving electronic processing and subsequent transmission of bill payment data; Electronic transfer of funds; Electronic transfer of money; Electronic transfers of money; Financial information processing; Financial information provided by electronic means; Financial services, namely, electronic remote check deposit services; Financial transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options using a mobile device at a point of sale; Providing electronic processing of ACH and credit card transactions and electronic payments via a global computer network; Providing electronic processing of credit card transactions and electronic payments via a global computer network; Providing electronic processing of electronic funds transfer, ACH, credit card, debit card, electronic check and electronic payments; Providing financial information; Providing financial information via a web site; Providing multiple payment options by means of customer-operated electronic terminals available on-site in retail stores | ACTIVE | May 7, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2023 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 13, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 6, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 7, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |