USPTO serial 86253828
MALRANK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MALRANK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara L. Friedman
BARBARA L. FRIEDMAN DERGOSITS & NOAH LLPOne Embarcadero Center, Suite 350San Francisco, CA 94111-4000UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for use in scoring security risks and privacy risks of mobile communications devices, mobile applications, cloud services, websites, web applications, networks, and the internet of things; software for scanning mobile communication devices, and for scoring, assessing, reporting, and preventing security risks and privacy risks on mobile communication devices; software for scoring, assessing, reporting, and preventing security risks and privacy risks on websites that are accessible by mobile communication devices; software for scoring, assessing, reporting, and preventing the security risks and privacy risks of installing software designed for mobile communication devices that is available on websites and software repositories, and for scoring, assessing, reporting, and preventing the security risks and privacy risks of software after installation of the software on mobile communication devices; mobile communication device anti-virus software; internet security software, namely, mobile communication device firewall, and intrusion prevention, and anti-phishing software; software for implementing security policy, spyware policy and privacy policy on a mobile communication device; software for preventing installation of undesired software on a mobile communication device; software for monitoring, backing up, preserving, and restoring mobile communications devices and mobile communications device data; software for remotely managing mobile communications devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services for others in the fields of mobile communication device data, network data, network security, and privacy, security risks, and privacy risks, namely, software development and maintenance for managing mobile communication device data, security risks, and privacy risks; services for others in the fields of mobile communication device data, security risks, and privacy risks, namely, troubleshooting mobile communication device software problems and diagnosing mobile communication device hardware problems; application service provider featuring software for the detection, monitoring, scoring, and removal of security risks and privacy risks, for monitoring, protecting, and securing mobile communication devices, networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 25, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 21, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 26, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |