USPTO serial 86255188
ROCKETFUEL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. REAL RESULTS.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROCKETFUEL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. REAL RESULTS.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Redwood City, CA
Redwood City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Connie L. Ellerbach, and Mark A. Jansen
Connie L. Ellerbach, and Mark A. Jansen FENWICK & WEST LLP801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041-1990UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertisement for others on the Internet; Advertisement via mobile phone networks; Analysis of advertising response; Dissemination of advertising for others via the Internet; Media buying advice based on computerized and personal analysis, namely, advising the client how much media time should be purchased, the kind of media that should be utilized, the target audience of the purchased media and at what times the client should be purchasing advertising | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software that selects digital media from digital media inventory and identifies advertising opportunities for others in the field of advertising and promoting the goods and services of others; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software that selects digital media from digital media inventory and identifies advertising opportunities for others in the field of advertising and promoting the goods and services of others; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for managing, collecting, integrating and sharing a wide variety of data and information regarding website visitor behavior and/or user interactions with digital media in the field of advertising and marketing optimization for businesses; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for recording website activity, mobile application activity, and/or responses to advertising, and managing, monitoring, analyzing and optimizing the performance and effectiveness of advertising and marketing campaigns; Providing online, non-downloadable software for managing, collecting, integrating and sharing a wide variety of data and information from various sources; Providing online, nondownloadable software for accessing and analyzing data, launching, serving and optimizing advertising campaigns, and evaluating advertising campaigns; Advertising services, namely, providing demographic, behavioral, psychographic, general audience information, customer information and segment information for use in creating, evaluating, and optimizing advertising campaigns; Providing online, nondownloadable software for data warehousing, data collection, data analysis, information reporting and presentation, and for customer relationship management; Advertising services, namely, providing an online computer database featuring customer purchasing decision information for use by advertisers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 2, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 26, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 11, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 26, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 31, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |