USPTO serial 86258058
LEGENDARY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEGENDARY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carla Calcagno
1250 24TH ST NW STE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20037-1186UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Shirts, t-shirts, tank tops, sweatshirts, pants, sweatpants, hooded sweatshirts, jackets, footwear, hats and caps, warm-up suits, pajamas, underwear, athletic apparel, namely, moisture-wicking sports shirts, and jerseys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |