Drawing for CURED

USPTO serial 86258069

CURED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CURED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles W. Hanor

CHARLES W HANOR HANOR LAW FIRM PC750 RITTIMAN ROADSAN ANTONIO, TX 78209-5500UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant servicesACTIVEDec 28, 2013

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 16, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 15, 2018MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 15, 2018ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 14, 2018EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 31, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 29, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 21, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 16, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 7, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2016GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2016GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 29, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 29, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 29, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 27, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 27, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 27, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 31, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 31, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 31, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 11, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 31, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance