USPTO serial 86258144
CARDPAYTEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASSIDY, COLLEEN MULCRONE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CARDPAYTEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mehmet Polat
MEHMET POLAT POLAT LAW FIRM363 7TH AVE RM 400NEW YORK, NY 10001-3904UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Blank CD-ROMs for sound or video recording; Blank electronic chip cards; Blank integrated circuit cards; Blank smart cards; Card readers for credit cards; Card readers for magnetically encoded cards; Card reading equipment; Computer operating systems; Computer peripherals; Computer software and firmware for authentication, encryption and identification in financial and sales transactions; Computer software and hardware for authentication, encryption and identification in financial and sales transactions; Computer software for encryption; Credit card encoding machines; Electronic encryption units; Electronic machines for reading credit cards and recording financial operations; Electronically encoded volunteer identity cards; Integrated circuit cards and components; Magnetically encoded credit cards; Magnetically encoded debit cards; Point-of-sale terminals; Pre-paid telephone calling cards, magnetically encoded; Smart card readers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Business technology software consultation services; Computer consultation; Computer consultation in the field of computer security; Computer programming and computer system analysis; Computer programming consultancy; Computer programming services for others in the field of software configuration management; Computer programming services for commercial analysis and reporting; Computer security consultancy; Computer services, namely, data recovery services; Computer software consultancy; Computer software consulting; Computer software design; Computer software design and updating; Computer software design for others; Computer system design services; Computer systems analysis; Consultancy in the field of software design; Consulting in the field of configuration management for computer hardware and software; Consulting services in the field of computer-based information systems for businesses; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Design of computer database; Software development consulting in the field of computer security and data recovery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |