Drawing for JEFFREY

USPTO serial 86258771

JEFFREY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JEFFREY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mason E. Heidt

Mason E. Heidt Thomas L. Pruitt, Attorney at Law, P.C.P.O. Box 1080Grundy, VA 24614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007centrifugal blowers; exhaust systems, namely, air blowers and parts thereof; Power operated blowers, namely, industrial blowers and exhausters and parts thereofACTIVE—
011blades for ventilation fans; blades for exhaust fans; ventilating exhaust fans; portable electric fans; ventilation fans for mining and industrial use; air blower fans, ventilating exhaust fans and parts thereofACTIVE—
037installation, repair and maintenance of fans for mining and industrial useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 22, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 21, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 8, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 6, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 20, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 10, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 13, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 12, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance