USPTO serial 86259121
BEAUTYRX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUNT, LEE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEAUTYRX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Burlington Flats, NY
Burlington Flats, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy J. Lyden
TIMOTHY J. LYDEN HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP7930 JONES BRANCH DR FL 9MC LEAN, VA 22102-3390UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Electrically-powered apparatus for treating skin by applying light therapy and sonic vibrations to the skin; Electronic light therapy apparatus for the skin; and Medical apparatus, namely, infusion devices for administering skincare treatments | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Sonic oscillating electric applicators for applying skin care products | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | microdermabrasion, laser treatments for acne, hair removal, and tattoo removal, and massage | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Stallex Skin Care, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Stallex Skin Care, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named BEAUTYRX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 12, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 24, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 28, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 28, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 21, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 6, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 11, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 14, 2014 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 14, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 4, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |