Drawing for TIFFANY & CO.

USPTO serial 86261941

TIFFANY & CO.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, ELIZABETH FLEMING
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIFFANY & CO.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Apolzon

LAWRENCE E. APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014WatchesACTIVE—
037Watch repair servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 27, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 10, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 9, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 3, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 23, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 20, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 22, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 22, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 25, 2014NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 30, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 10, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 28, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 27, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 18, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 12, 2014CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Aug 12, 2014CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2014EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Aug 6, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 9, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 8, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance