USPTO serial 86262471
QUALITY AND TRUST TOPVALU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 7, 2016
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with QUALITY AND TRUST TOPVALU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chiba-City, Chiba, JP
Chiba-City, Chiba, JP
Chiba-City, Chiba, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Silverman
DAVID M. SILVERMAN Davis Wright Tremaine LLP1919 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.Suite 800Washington, DC 20006-3401Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fish and shellfish, not live; foods prepared from fish, namely, fish sausages, fish cakes; processed beans; processed vegetables; processed fruits; frozen vegetables; frozen fruits; eggs; processed eggs, namely, frozen eggs, egg substitute; milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fats; preparations for making soup; Preparations for making pre-cooked stew; preparations for making pre-cooked curry stew that contain meats and/or vegetables; deep fried tofu pieces; vegetable paste, namely, paste made from the arum root; soy milk; tofu, fermented soybeans; soups of Japanese noodles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 12, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Aeon Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Aeon Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Aeon Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named QUALITY AND TRUST TOPVALU
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 3, 2016 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 13, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2014 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |