USPTO serial 86264469
GLOBAL MOBILE CONGRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REINHART, MEGHAN M
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLOBAL MOBILE CONGRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | organizing and conducting business conferences, trade shows and exhibitions in the field of mobile communications all for commercial or advertising purposes, organizing, conducting and arranging business and advertising exhibitions in the fields of mobile wireless communications and mobile wireless technologies, organizing, conducting, arranging and hosting business competitions in the fields of mobile wireless communications and mobile wireless technologies, organizing, conducting and arranging business conferences, trade shows and exhibitions in the field of mobile wireless communications and mobile wireless technologies all for commercial or advertising purposes, business data analysis; promotional services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others, business networking; business monitoring and consulting services, namely, tracking users and advertising of others to provide strategy, insight, marketing guidance, and for analyzing, understanding and predicting consumer behavior and motivations, and market trends;providing information regarding careers, employment, and job placement; providing market information in relation to consumer products, sales promotion for others; business information services, preparing and placing of advertisements, advertising publication services; advertising and advertisement services, advertisement and publicity services by television, radio, websites, mails and mobile devices | ABANDONED | Nov 15, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2015 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 18, 2015 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2015 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 8, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |