Drawing for CAPACITY FOR CHANGE

USPTO serial 86264881

CAPACITY FOR CHANGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAPACITY FOR CHANGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carl A. Kukkonen, III

CARL A. KUKKONEN, III MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVKSY POPEO PC666 Third Avenue, 24th FloorNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035energy demand response services, namely, administering an incentive program to reduce energy usage during periods of high energy demand; outsource service provider in the field of energy usage management for others; consulting services in the field of energy usage management; consulting services in the fields of energy consumption and conservation to improve energy efficiency and energy reliability; energy price comparison services; energy usage management services; energy usage management and efficiency information services; arranging of contracts for third parties in the field of computer hardware and softwareACTIVE—
042site surveying, namely, consulting in the field of design and development of computer hardware and software systems; installation, maintenance, and updating of computer software; computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of computer hardware and software; computer services, namely, remote and on-site management and operation of computer systems between commodity providers, system operators and end-users for the consumption, distribution, generation and storage of energy commodities and water commodities, and for the analysis and optimization of energy and water transmission and distribution systems; energy usage metering and monitoring for electric power providers and electricity consumers; remote monitoring and controlling of energy consuming and conserving devices including, heating, ventilating and air conditioning apparatus, lighting, standby generators, batteries for smoothing intermittency of renewable energy sources, for commercial, industrial, government, and residential sites for the purpose of controlling energy use; remote monitoring and controlling of renewable energy generation devices, namely, solar photovoltaic power systems and wind powered energy generation systems, for commercial, industrial, government, and residential sites; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for remote monitoring, analyzing, and managing of energy; non-downloadable computer software for providing analysis and optimization services to energy commodities providers and transmission and distribution system operators or their designated intermediaries; consulting services in the fields of energy measurement to improve energy efficiency and energy reliability; energy auditing servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 18, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 16, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 16, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 16, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2015NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 21, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 8, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2015NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 18, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 18, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 2, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 27, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 27, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 11, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 9, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 27, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 13, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 2, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance