USPTO serial 86265822
KLOUD KLOUD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 24, 2015
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KLOUD KLOUD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lotte Chilsung Beverage Co., Ltd.
Seoul, KR
Lotte Chilsung Beverage Co., Ltd.
Seoul, KR
Lotte Chilsung Beverage Co., Ltd.
Seoul, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yoon S. Ham
YOON S. HAM LOWE HAUPTMAN & HAM, LLP2318 MILL RD STE 1400ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-6878UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Mineral and aerated water; Beverages, namely, non-alcoholic beer flavored beverages; Extracts of hops for making beer; Lager beer; Preparations for making liqueurs, namely, essences used in the preparation of liqueurs; Malt beer; Malt wort; Beer; Beer wort; Stout; Ale; Imitation beer; Ginger beer; Synthetic beer, namely, beer-based cocktails; Dark beer | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lotte Chilsung Beverage Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Lotte Chilsung Beverage Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Lotte Chilsung Beverage Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named KLOUD KLOUD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 6, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 29, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 27, 2014 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 11, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2014 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |