USPTO serial 86266635
KILIMANJARO EXPEDITION OUTFITTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEELEY, ALISON REBECCA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KILIMANJARO EXPEDITION OUTFITTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elliot L. Schaeffer
845 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Blouses; Bottoms; Coats; Dresses; Dusters; Footwear; Headgear, namely, hats, caps, and sweatbands; Hosiery; Jackets, namely, jackets not specially constructed and adapted for wearing by motorcycle riders; Jeans; Jumpsuits; Lingerie; Loungewear; Neckwear; Pajamas; Pants; Robes; Rompers; Scarves; Shirts; Shorts; Skirts; Sleepwear; Slippers; Socks; Suits; Swim wear; T-shirts; Tops; Undergarments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |