USPTO serial 86269588
SYNOPSYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SYNOPSYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Madurai, Tamil Nadu, IN
Madurai, Tamil Nadu, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew D. Dorisio
ANDREW D DORISIO KING & SCHICKLI PLLC247 N BROADWAYLEXINGTON, KY 40507-1058UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SIM cards; Standardised Simcard; Small sized SIM cards; NanoSIM cards; Sockets for SIM cards for Mobile Phone; Sockets for Standard sized SIM cards for Mobile Phone; Sockets for Small sized SIM cards for Mobile Phone; Sockets for NanoSIM cards for Mobile Phone; Telephones including Telephones for domestic use; Landline Telephone; Cordless Telephones; Car Telephones; Electronic Telephones; VOIP Phone; Video Telephones; Mobile Telephones; Cellular Phone; Mobile Phone; Cell Phone; Tablet Smartphone; Touch Phone; Smartphone; Qwerty Messaging Phone; Multimedia Phone; Satellite Mobile Telephones; Satellite Cellular Telephones; Satellite Mobile Phone; Network Communication Equipment, namely, telecommunications base stations for cellular and fixed networking; Optical Communication Equipment, namely, optical transmitters, optical receivers; TV; Television; CRT Television; Plasma Television; LCD Television; LED Television; Ultraslim Television; Flat Television; Wireless Local Area Networking communication devices, namely, computer cards for connecting portable computer devices to computer networks, access points for connecting network computer users; Data communications network adapters | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |