USPTO serial 86270506
ESSIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ESSIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ladera Ranch, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Darius Gleason
DARIUS GLEASON LAW OFFICE OF DARIUS GLEASON APC24310 MOULTON PKWYSTE O # 176LAGUNA HILLS, CA 92637-3306Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Auto aftermarket accessories, namely, vehicle custom grills; Automotive body kits comprising external structural parts of automobiles; Tires for land vehicles; Tires for vehicle wheels; Wheel rims; Wheel rims; Wheels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 3, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |