Drawing for IMAGINE! EXPRESS COMPANIES

USPTO serial 86272763

IMAGINE! EXPRESS COMPANIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOZAK, EVIN L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMAGINE! EXPRESS COMPANIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael T. Olsen

MICHAEL T. OLSEN WINTHROP & WEINSTINE, P.A.225 South Sixth StreetCapella Tower, Suite 3500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4629

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer e-commerce software management tools for streamlining print supply chains by providing project management, campaign management, inventory management, fulfillment services, file transfer, digital asset management, and print on demand functionalityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 5, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 4, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 9, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 9, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 19, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 30, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 29, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 29, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 15, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 15, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 14, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 13, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 21, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 17, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 9, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance