Drawing for INTENT BASED PRICE OPTIMIZATION

USPTO serial 86272850

INTENT BASED PRICE OPTIMIZATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INTENT BASED PRICE OPTIMIZATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert D. Atkins

ROBERT D. ATKINS PATENT LAW GROUP: ATKINS AND ASSOCIATES, P.C.55 N ARIZONA PL STE 104CHANDLER, AZ 85225-5819UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software, namely, software for collecting consumer data and comparing the consumer data with retailer or manufacturer objectives to formulate personalized pricing; software for optimizing and personalizing pricing based on consumer preferences; and software for assisting with the negotiation of purchasing decisionsACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, providing use of a software application for collecting consumer data and comparing the consumer data with retailer or manufacturer objectives to formulate personalized pricing; providing use of a software application for optimizing and personalizing pricing based on consumer preferences; and providing use of a software application for assisting with the negotiation of purchasing decisionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 19, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 21, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 19, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 9, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance