USPTO serial 86273149
8 BALL POOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 8 BALL POOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Neuchatel 2001, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bassam N. Ibrahim
BASSAM N. IBRAHIM BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY, PCPO BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game programs; video game programs; downloadable software for playing videos and on-line games; interactive computer game programs; downloadable computer game software via a global computer network; computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones, handheld computers, computers, video game consoles and other wireless devices, both handheld and free standing | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational and entertainment services, namely, providing online computer games, video games accessed and played via electronic, wireless and computer networks; Providing non-downloadable computer games that may be accessed network-wide by network users; Providing on-line multi-user computer games via local computer networks, global computer networks and the Internet; Providing non-downloadable computer and video games accessed and played on electronic, wireless, and computer networks; Providing non-downloadable computer and video games accessed by or for use on mobile and cellular telephones and other wireless devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2016 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 21, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |