USPTO serial 86273419
WELDINGQUIPMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHINER, MARK W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WELDINGQUIPMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn A. Sullivan
LYNN A. SULLIVAN LEYDIG VOIT & MAYER, LTD.2 PRUDENTIAL PLAZA 180 N STETSON STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Laser-beam processing apparatus for surface hardening, coating, sintering, cutting, engraving, welding, soldering and heat-treatment, and installations consisting essentially thereof; Laser installations for surface hardening, coating, sintering, cutting, engraving, welding, soldering and heat-treatment of workpieces; Laser-based welding and soldering equipment and apparatus; Laser welding apparatus; Laser welding apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Computer programs for control technology, regulating technology and process diagnostics for laser-beam processing apparatus and installations; Data processing equipment for laser-beam processing apparatus and installations | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Welding; Processing of plastics; Laser scribing services; Treatment of materials, namely welding by means of laser beams | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical consultancy, planning and development in the field of laser beam processing apparatus and installations; Preparation of data processing programmes; Technological investigations in the field of the treatment of materials by means of laser welding technology, for others; research in the field of laser welding technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LPKF Laser & Electronics AG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WELDINGQUIPMENT
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |