USPTO serial 86277178
AFFDEX DISCOVERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AFFDEX DISCOVERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gwenn Roos
GWENN ROOS LAW OFFICE OF GWENN ROOS26 BROOKDALE AVEWELLESLEY, MA 02482-1021UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | An optical metrology inspection system comprised of a light source, one or more cameras and sensors in communication with computer software and hardware; Computer hardware and peripheral devices and computer software for data communication and translating and transmitting data sold therewith; Computer hardware and software for medical imaging apparatus; Computer hardware and software systems for use in collecting, testing, measuring and evaluating facial expressions and body language and facial expression signals; Computer hardware for telecommunications; Computer software for communicating with users of hand-held computers; Computer software for organizing and viewing digital images and photographs; Computer software for processing digital images; Computer software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information; Computer software that provides real-time, integrated business management intelligence by combining information from various databases and presenting it in an easy-to-understand user interface; Computer-controlled electronic apparatus for electrophysiological measurement and testing of cells; Decoder software; Electric or electronic sensors for use in collecting, testing, measuring and evaluating facial expressions and body language and facial expression signals; Electric sensors; Electronic and optical communications instruments and components, namely, communication link testers for testing communication links; Electronic data relays for sensors; Electronic interconnecters for audio and video signals; Electronic monitors and monitor modules for monitoring electric current and electrical signals; Electronic products for the generation, measurement, and analysis of audio signals, namely, audio analyzers; Electronic scalers for audio and video signals; Interactive multimedia computer program for use in collecting, testing, measuring and evaluating facial expressions and body language and facial expression signals; Interfaces and peripheral devices for computers; Optical character readers; Optical character recognition (OCR) apparatus; Optical character recognition apparatus; Optical character recognition apparatus; Optical communications systems comprised of optical and electronic hardware and computer software for the transmission of data between two points; Optical sensors; Pattern recognition systems composed of computer chips, computer hardware and software; Photoelectric sensors; Software for optical character recognition; Transmitters of electronic signals; Ultrasonic instrumentation for testing machines; Ultrasonic sensors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 4, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 25, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 10, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 10, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 4, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 4, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 9, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |