USPTO serial 86277950
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Edmonton, AB, Canada, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Catering services; Coffee bars; Coffee shops; Fast-food restaurant services; Food and drink catering; Ice cream shop services in the nature of a restaurant; Juice bar services; Outside catering services; Restaurant and café services; Restaurant and catering services; Restaurant and hotel services; Restaurant services; Restaurant services, including sit-down service of food and take-out restaurant services; Restaurant services, namely, providing of food and beverages for consumption on and off the premises; Snack bar services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |