Drawing for OH BOY

USPTO serial 86278227

OH BOY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KOLACZ, KATHLEEN L
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OH BOY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028sporting goods, namely, golf balls, footballs, basketballs, baseballs, and golf clubs, including golf club headsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 1, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 8, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 13, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 13, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED
Feb 12, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 12, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Feb 12, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Dec 30, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 30, 2015DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Dec 30, 2015ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Dec 30, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 5, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 5, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 15, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 28, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 27, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 9, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 21, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 20, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 20, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2014GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Aug 31, 2014GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Aug 31, 2014EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY
Aug 31, 2014CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Aug 24, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 22, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 15, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance