USPTO serial 86284187
PERFORMANCE CHANNEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERFORMANCE CHANNEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | posters; binders; calendars; document portfolios; composition books; pens; pencils; bookmarks; stickers; decals; postcards; penholders; notebooks; folders; desktop business card holders | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | umbrellas; luggage; backpacks; tote bags; garment bags for travel; overnight bags; fanny packs; briefcases; business card holders in the nature of card cases | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | plastic cups; beverageware; plaques of crystal; plaques of glass; insulating sleeve-holders for beverage cans; ornaments made of glass | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | towels; bed blankets; cloth banners | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | shirts; t-shirts; tops; sweatshirts; shorts; pants; sweatpants; tights; jackets; vests; gloves; hats; headbands; scarves; socks; skirts; undergarments; footwear | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | coordination of recreational sporting opportunities for individuals who wish to participate in team league sports; consulting services in the field of sports recruiting of high school athletes; consulting services in the field of sports career information | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | broadcasting of radio and television programs relating to sports | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | organizing of sports competitions; operation of sports camps; sports training services; sports instruction services; coaching in the field of sports; consulting services in the fields of sports performance and sports training; consulting services in the fields of sports training to enhance athletic development; educational services, namely, providing workshops, clinics, classes and seminars in the fields of sports, athletic performance, leadership and character development; entertainment services, namely, providing a website featuring information, video and audio presentations, non-downloadable photographs, Web and video blogs, training videos, podcasts, and mental performance videos, all relating to sports; production of radio and television programs relating to sports; organizing, conducting and operating lacrosse tournaments; coordination of recreational sporting opportunities, namely, operating of sports camps, conducting of individual sports competitions, exhibitions and tournaments all in the field of lacrosse, field hockey, volleyball, soccer, basketball, swim, tennis and gymnastics, and conducting lacrosse, field hockey, volleyball, soccer, basketball, swim, tennis and gymnastics events | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | consulting services in the field of health assessment to determine sports performance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Revolution Lacrosse, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Revolution Lacrosse, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named PERFORMANCE CHANNEL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 6, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 3, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 4, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 2, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 2, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 8, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 18, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2014 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 8, 2014 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 8, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 2, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |