Drawing for S-PLEX

USPTO serial 86285285

S-PLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with S-PLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith A. Weltsch

KEITH A. WELTSCH SCULLY, SCOTT, MURPHY & PRESSER, P.C.400 GARDEN CITY PLZ STE 300GARDEN CITY, NY 11530-3319UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Biological assays and kits, namely, self-assembled arrays for simultaneous, multiple detection of biological analytes and for use in the fields of biological and diagnostic testing for industrial, scientific and/or research useACTIVE—
005Biological assays and kits, namely, self-assembled arrays for simultaneous, multiple detection of biological analytes and for use in the fields of biological and diagnostic testing for medical and/or veterinary useACTIVE—
009Multi-well plates that can be used in chemical or biological analysis using electrochemiluminescence for scientific, laboratory or medical research useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 2, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 1, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 3, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 21, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 31, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 30, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 25, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 25, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 7, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 23, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 23, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 14, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 25, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 25, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 31, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 25, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 25, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 28, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 26, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 26, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 26, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 25, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 30, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 10, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 25, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 14, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 5, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 30, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 22, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance