USPTO serial 86285733
BJNI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BJNI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sevag Demirjian
SEVAG DEMIRJIAN DEMIRJIAN LAW OFFICES5200 Lankershim Blvd. Suite 850North Hollywood, CA 91601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Mineral and carbonated waters | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2018 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2017 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 2, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 22, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 23, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 3, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |