USPTO serial 86286255
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Taichung City 408, TW
Taichung City 408, TW
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
P. Jay Hines
PJAY HINES MUNCY GEISSLER OLDS & LOWE PC4000 LEGATO RD STE 310FAIRFAX, VA 22033-2898UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer memory and storage devices, namely, high-speed storage subsystems for storage and backup of electronic data either locally or via a telecommunications network; ROM storage; Computer memory cassette; Dynamic random access memory (DRAM); RAM (random access memory) card; Random Access Memory Module; Expansion Card; Memory cards (computer hardware); Secure Digital (SD) memory cards; Portable Flash Memory; Magnetic identifying cards; Magnetically encoded credit cards; Telephone cards; Magnetically encoded debit cards; Blank integrated circuit cards (blank smart cards); Computer identification card; Blank electronic chip cards (bank smart cards); Magnetic stripe storage card; Blank smart cards; Magnetic stripe cards; Magnetically encoded identification bracelets | ABANDONED | Nov 1, 2013 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 31, 2014 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |